Harvey, over at the Alliance of Free Bloggers, has posed an interesting question: Should Evil Glenn be the United States’ Attorney General, and why or why not?
After a great deal of soul searching (mine, not Glenn’s, for the simple fact that it’s not there) I must say that I have to say no.
I just cannot see asking someone to be one of the protectors of America’s Laws when that person does not obey all of the laws of nature.
Besides, Evil Glenn would never be able to handle the loss of influence that would occur when he left the blogsphere. Attorney General is a powerful position, but it is nothing compared to being the Dark Overlord of the Blogsphere.
INSTAPUNDO DELENDA EST!
(That is all)